Posts Tagged ‘Insurance’
Auto insurance TV ads more creative; direct mail lagging
While I follow the insurance direct marketing industry, I can’t help but feel a little envious of what I’m seeing on television. At least in the Chicago area, where I sit between the two largest auto insurers Allstate and State Farm, I seem to be seeing more auto insurance commercials.
Earlier this year, Advertising Age reported that in 2009, GEICO out-spent the next highest auto insurance advertiser, Progressive, by more than 60 percent. Both State Farm and Allstate, who spend on parity with each other, spent less than half that of GEICO.
Progressive
Progressive’s concept of an insurance company as a consumer package goods superstore is continuing with Pickles, the dog, teaming up with Flo to provide a comparative quote. You can’t go wrong featuring a cute animal. Flo is now playing second banana and providing a voiceover as the commercials end with a shot of Pickles in charge.
GEICO
The Gecko has a long history with GEICO and his new commercials take advantage of his steady development as a spokesperson. No longer is he casually talking about pie and chips to a real gecko, as he did in one of his first commercials. Now he is talking in front of conference audiences with all the giveaways branded in his likeness. Like Progressive’s Flo, GEICO is capitalizing on a developed brand image.
Esurance
Still working to develop an image, Esurance seems to have placed secret agent Erin into deep cover as they now use a small group of dedicated employees who talk about their interactions with Esurance customers. Whether it’s The Saver or the Coverage Counselor, this cast of spokespersons grabs attention by playing out short stories on the experiences of being an Esurance customer.
Both of today’s leading auto insurers stick with the real life spokesperson format. Together, State Farm and Allstate challenge Progressive and GEICO’s messages of saving money and fast quotes.
State Farm
State Farm has developed its spokesman into the customer’s friend who reminds them to check whether their friends and family are one of 40 million State Farm customers. Then he one-ups the competition by telling the audience that State Farm is larger than Progressive and GEICO combined.
Allstate
Similarly, Allstate continues to rely on Denis Haysbert as the spokesperson for most of their commercials. In a new campaign he supports Dean Winters, portraying Mayhem, in a series depicting causes of accidents. Allstate, like State Farm, challenges GEICO’s message by asking if a fifteen minute call could provide the service you get from your personal agent.
It’s clear that these five companies are spending a lot on the development of new brand images. Apparently the money is coming from their print advertising since Adweek recently reported that the auto insurance industry reduced its print spending by 26 percent in 2009. Some of that decrease may include direct mail, which Comperemedia reports as having decreased five percent last year from 2008.
These five companies can be split into two groups when it comes to direct mail strategy. Both Progressive and Esurance have nearly stopped mailing. Of the others, GEICO is still the largest mailer, not segmenting who receives a solicitation, while Allstate and State Farm maintain strong mail levels and utilize their agents to guide the segments on address labels.
When I look at auto insurance direct mail, I’m surprised how different the pieces are from the companies’ commercials. There’s a dysfunctional integrated marketing strategy, a direct marketing channel disconnect. The images these companies are investing in and creating on television are not being leveraged in their direct mail solicitations.
I would think it would be an advantage to incorporate the TV brand images into mail campaigns as a reminder of the company’s brand values. After all, the advantage of advertising is it builds the brand through repetition of a message.
Delayed MLR rules could negatively impact insurer’s planning
I’m concerned about the recent delay in setting rules for the medical loss ratio (MLR) provision of health reform. With the implementation set for January 1, 2011 there is not much time for health insurers to develop their plans for next year.
Under the health reform rules, insurers are required to spend 85 percent on medical care for every premium dollar received from group plans, and 80 percent for premiums received from small group and individual plans. HHS (US Department of Health and Human Services) is charged with managing the development of the rules and guidelines. It has asked NAIC (National Association of Insurance Commissioners) for their recommendations on how to calculate and implement the MLR requirement. They have missed their target of June 30, 2010 to have rules in place. In their defense, it is complicated.
Because of the delay, a political fight is developing over the issue. Senator Al Franken is calling for vigilance to make sure the insurance industry doesn’t define medical expense as everything that is not profit. He has cited the recent announcement by Wellpoint to reclassify $500 million in administrative expenses such as health and wellness, nurse hotline, smoking cessation and weight loss programs as medical.
I’ve noticed in Comperemedia a recent letter to Assurant producers notifying them that, because of the uncertainty of the MLR rules, Assurant will reserve the right to change commissions for next year and is placing a temporary limit on first year commissions. With this uncertainty stretching well into next year’s planning cycle, I’m wondering if it is more than simply constraining planning or if it is having a material affect? More importantly, has the concern about MLR’s impact on commissions caused policy sales to slow?
